Open Access

Supplemental effects of biofloc powder on growth performance, innate immunity, and disease resistance of Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei

Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences201720:15

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41240-017-0059-7

Received: 20 January 2017

Accepted: 6 July 2017

Published: 25 July 2017

Abstract

An 8-week feeding trial was conducted to study the effect of dietary supplementation of a biofloc powder on growth performance and non-specific immune response of Litopenaeus vannamei. Seven experimental diets were prepared with supplementation of graded levels of dried biofloc powder by 0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, and 8.0% (designated as Con, BF0.5, BF1, BF2, BF4, BF6, and BF8, respectively). Triplicate groups of shrimp (1.01 ± 0.01 g) were hand-fed with one of the diets four times a day. At the end of the feeding trial, significantly (P ˂ 0.05) higher growth performance and feed utilization were obtained in BF4 groups compared to those fed the Con diet. The innate immunity of shrimp was improved by the dietary supplementation of biofloc. Dietary inclusion of biofloc at the level of 4.0% significantly increased disease resistance of shrimp against Vibrio harveyi. The results indicate that biofloc might be used as a dietary supplement for growth performance, innate immunity and disease resistance of Pacific white shrimp.

Keywords

Biofloc powder Innate immunity Growth performance Disease resistance Litopenaeus vannamei

Background

Diseases caused by infectious microorganisms are known to be one of the major constraints in the shrimp aquaculture industry for the past decades (Ekasari et al., 2014). Thus, there is a need to control the disease outbreaks in this sector. A concept of a functional feed is an emerging paradigm in aquaculture industry to develop nutritionally balanced diets with functions to control the diseases and culture water system by feed additives (Li and Gatlin 2004; Lee et al., 2013; Wongsasak et al., 2015).

The application of biofloc technology (BFT) in shrimp aquaculture has gained great attention. BFT offers a practical solution to control culture water quality effectively with negligible water exchange and improves shrimp growth performances in the healthy culture environment (De Schryver et al., 2008; Stokstad, 2010; Avnimelech, 2012; Crab et al., 2012; Xu and Pan 2013). The mechanism of the BFT is to reuse excreted dissolved nitrogen by heterotrophic bacteria by controlling carbon and nitrogen ratio in the culture water (Avnimelech, 1999). The biofloc in the BFT system is formed by aggregating many substances such as, other microorganisms, microalgae, zooplankton, and trapped organic particles or solids from uneaten feeds (De Schryver et al., 2008; Crab et al., 2012; Ekasari et al., 2014). It has been demonstrated that the active and condensed microorganisms together with suspended organic or inorganic particles tend to from biofloc, which can be consumed constantly by cultured shrimp as a natural food source (Burford et al., 2004; Wasielesky et al., 2006; Kent et al., 2011). Thus, the biofloc itself provides biomass which is served as nutrients for shrimp especially as a protein source or immunostimulants. Previous studies showed that biofloc had enhanced cellular immune response and antioxidant status of cultured shrimp by its richness in microbes and bioactive compounds (Ju et al., 2008; Xu and Pan 2013). Similar result was found when L. vannamei were fed a formulated 35% crude protein diet in biofloc-based culture tanks for a period of 30 days; however, it is not clear if feeding a relatively low protein diet (35%) with the contribution of biofloc could sustain the health status of cultured shrimp in such systems (Xu and Pan 2013). Jang et al. (2011) also reported that the expression of prophenoloxidase-activating enzyme was significantly increased in the shrimp reared in a biofloc system.

Pacific white shrimp is one of the most important shrimp species currently being cultured in many countries. Over the past decade, mass production of L. vannamei has been demonstrated in biofloc-based intensive culture systems under high aeration and negligible water exchange (Avnimelech, 2012; Haslun et al., 2012). Recently, it was demonstrated that dietary inclusion of biofloc had enhanced growth performance of L. vannamei (Ju et al., 2008; Kuhn et al., 2010; Bauer et al., 2012). There is a lack of information to support the role of biofloc in diets on growth and immune response in the species. Hence, to investigate the suitability of biofloc as a dietary supplement, we included it in diets at different levels and fed to L. vannamei. The present study aims to evaluate the effect of dietary supplementation of biofloc on growth performance, non-specific immune response, and susceptibility to bacterial infection caused by V. harveyi in L. vannamei juveniles.

Methods

Preparation of biofloc

The biofloc was collected from L. vannamei BFT tanks. A biofloc suspension was prepared in a 300 ton polypropylene tank (45 × 6.5 m) filled with seawater and stocked with L. vannamei. The C: N ratio was maintained at 15:1 using molasses as a carbon source. Probiotics containing Bacillus subtilis, Lactobacillus casei and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Total bacterial account = 1 × 106 CFU/mL) were added into the biofloc ponds once a week until enough biofloc sample was collected. Biofloc collection was continued for 12 h with enough and strong aeration in the BFT tanks. During the aeration, sludges (flocs) were formed on the water surface. The collected flocs were rapidly frozen at −80 °C, and then vacuum freeze-dried. The dried flocs were ground into fine powder (<100 μm) and kept in airtight containers in refrigerator until used in experimental diets. Chemical composition of the biofloc powder is provided in Table 1.
Table 1

Biofloc chemical composition (dry matter)

Parameter

Biofloc

Proximate composition

(%)

Crude protein

28.7

Crude lipid

2.30

Crude ash

43.0

Amino acid composition

(%)

Methionine

0.36

Arginine

1.17

Phenylalanine

1.16

Leucine

1.81

Isoleucine

1.02

Lysine

1.11

Valine

1.51

Threonine

1.31

Histidine

0.41

Trace mineral composition

(mg/kg)

Zinc

521.8

Aluminum

287.8

Manganese

180.7

Iron

146.9

Copper

34.0

Aluminum silicate

3.4

Cadmium

2.7

Experimental diets and design

Seven experimental diets were formulated to be isonitrogenous (400 g kg−1 crude protein) and isocaloric (16 MJ kg−1). A basal fishmeal based diet was regarded as a control and supplemented with biofloc at the incremental levels of 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, and 8.0% (designated as Con, BF0.5, BF1, BF2, BF4, BF6, and BF8, respectively) at the expense of soybean meal and wheat flour. All dry ingredients were thoroughly mixed in a feed mixer (NVM-16, Gyeonggido, South Korea) and pelleted through a pellet machine (SP-50; Gumgang Engineering, Daegu, Korea). The pelleted diets were dried at 25 °C for 12 h, and stored at −24 °C until used. Formulation and proximate composition of the experimental diets are shown in Table 2.
Table 2

Dietary formulation and proximate composition of the seven experimental diets for L. vannamei (% dry matter)

Ingredients

Experimental diets

Con

BF0.5

BF1

BF2

BF4

BF6

BF8

Brown fishmeal

28.0

28.0

28.0

28.0

28.0

28.0

28.0

Soybean meal

30.0

30.0

30.0

29.5

28.5

27.5

26.5

Squid liver meal

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

3.00

Wheat flour

29.0

28.5

28.0

27.5

26.5

25.5

24.5

Starch

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

5.00

Fish oil

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Mineral mixa

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Vitamin mixb

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Choline chloride

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Lecithin

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Biofloc

0.00

0.50

1.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

Chemical composition (% dry matter)

 Dry matter

93.2

93.8

94.0

93.2

93.1

93.6

93.5

 Crude protein

40.8

40.9

40.7

40.6

41.0

41.0

41.0

 Crude lipid

6.70

7.50

7.10

7.00

7.60

7.30

7.50

 Crude Ash

8.00

8.40

8.30

8.60

9.30

10.0

10.8

 Energy, MJ/kg diet

16.6

16.6

16.6

16.5

16.4

16.2

16.1

aMineral premix (g/kg mixture): MgSO4.7H2O, 80.0; NaH2PO4.2H2O, 370.0; KCl, 130.0; Ferric citrate, 40.0; ZnSO4.7H2O, 20.0; Ca-lactate, 356.5; CuCl, 0.2; AlCl3.6H2O, 0.15; Na2Se2O3, 0.01; MnSO4.H2O, 2.0; CoCl2.6H2O, 1.0

bVitamin premix (g/kg mixture): L-ascorbic acid, 121.2; DL-tocopheryl acetate, 18.8; thiamin hydrochloride, 2.7; riboflavin, 9.1; pyridoxine hydrochloride, 1.8; niacin, 36.4; Ca-D-pantothenate, 12.7; myo-inositol, 181.8; D-biotin, 0.27; folic acid, 0.68; p-aminobezoic acid, 18.2; menadione, 1.8; retinyl acetate, 0.73; cholecalficerol, 0.003; cyanocobalamin, 0.003

Shrimp and feeding trial

The feeding trial was conducted in indoor shrimp culture facilities at the Marine Science Institute of the Jeju National University (Jeju, South Korea). Juvenile L. vannamei was obtained from NeoEnBiz shrimp farm (Dangjin, South Korea). Shrimps were fed a commercial diet (35% crud protein) twice daily for 10 days to be acclimated to the experimental conditions and facilities. Then, the shrimps (initial mean body weight, 1.01 ± 0.01 g) were randomly distributed into twenty one acryl aquaria of 96 L capacity at a density of 18 shrimp per aquarium. Each aquarium was supplied with filtered seawater and aeration to maintain enough dissolved oxygen. Triplicate groups of shrimp were hand-fed with one of the test diets four times a day at 08:00, 12.00, 16.00, and 18:00 h for 8 weeks. Daily feeding rates were slowly reduced from 10 to 8% of wet body weight during the 8-week feeding period. Water in the aquaria was exchanged every 3-day intervals while inside of the aquaria were cleaned by a sponge to prevent the growth of microflora. A 12:12 h light/dark regime (08:00–19:00 h, light period) was maintained by timed fluorescent lighting. The water temperature was maintained at 28 ± 1 °C, pH ranged from 7.04 to 8.04, and dissolved oxygen was kept above 6.0 mg L−1 and total ammonia nitrogen and nitrite were kept <0.1 and 0.005 mg L−1, respectively. Growth of shrimp was measured with 2-week intervals. Feeding was stopped 16 h prior to weighing or hemolymph sampling to minimize handling stress on the shrimp.

Sample collection and analyses

At the end of the feeding trial, all shrimp in each tank were counted and bulk-weighed for calculation of growth parameters and survival. Five shrimp per tank (fifteen shrimp per dietary treatment) in inter-molt stage were randomly captured, anesthetized with ice-cold water and hemolymph samples (200 μl) were individually collected from ventral sinus of shrimp using a 1-mL syringe. Then, the hemolymph (200 μL) was filled with an equal volume of anticoagulant solution (200 μL) (Alsever’s solution, Sigma). The molt stage of the shrimp was determined by an examination of uropoda (Robertson et al., 1987). The hemolymph-anticoagulant mixture (diluted hemolymph) was placed in five sterile eppendorf tubes containing equal volume for the determination of the total hemocyte counts (THC) and respiratory burst activity. After the abovementioned measurements with diluted hemolymph, the remained samples was centrifuged at 800×g for 20 min using a high-speed refrigerated microcentrifuge (Micro 17 TR; HanilBioMed Inc., Gwangju, Korea) and stored at −70 °C for determination of phenoloxidase (PO), superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities, total immunoglobulin (Ig) level and glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity.

Analyses of moisture and ash contents of biofloc powder and diet samples were performed by the standard procedures (AOAC, 1995). Crude protein was measured by using an automatic Kjeltec Analyzer Unit 2300 (Foss Tecator, Höganäs, Sweden), and crude lipid was determined using the Soxhlet method with extraction in diethyl ether (Soxhlet Extraction System C-SH6, Korea).

Monitoring of non-specific immune responses

A drop of the diluted haemolymph was placed in a hemocytometer to measure THC using an inverted phase-contrast microscope (Olympus, Model CH30RF200, Olympus Optical Co., LTD, Japan). Diluted hemolymph protein content was measured using a microprotein determination method (C-690; Sigma). Oxidative radical production by hemocytes during respiratory burst was measured through the nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) assay described by Dantzler et al. (2001). PO activity was measured spectrophotometrically by recording the formation of dopachrome produced from L-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA, Sigma) following the procedure of Hernández-López et al. (1996). Lysozyme activity was determined following previously described method (Paglia and Valentine, 1967). SOD activity was measured by the percentage reaction inhibition rate of enzyme with WST-1 (water-soluble tetrazolium dye) substrate and xanthine oxidase using a SOD Assay Kit (Sigma, 19160) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each endpoint assay was monitored by absorbance at 450 nm (the absorbance wavelength for the colored product of WST-1 reaction with superoxide) after 20 min of reaction time at 37 °C. The percent inhibition was normalized by mg protein and presented as SOD activity units. Ig level was determined according to the method described by Siwicki et al. (1994). Briefly, plasma total protein content was measured using a microprotein determination method (C-690; Sigma), prior to and after precipitating down the Ig molecules, using a 12% solution of polyethylene glycol (Sigma). The difference in protein content represents the Ig content. GPX activity was assayed using a kit (Biovision, Inc., Milpitas, CA, USA).

Challenge test

At the end of the feeding trial, 12 shrimp from each tank (24 shrimp per treatment) were randomly selected and subjected to a bacterial challenge. V. harveyi was used as the pathogenic agent (provided by the Marine Microbiology Laboratory of Jeju National University). The shrimp were injected intramuscularly with V. harveyi suspension containing 2 × 108 CFU mL−1 and distributed into fourteen 120-L acryl tanks. The pathogenic dose of bacterium had previously been determined in a preliminary test using similar size of shrimp. After injection, the challenging shrimp was not fed the diets and the mortality was monitored for 19 days.

Statistical analysis

All dietary treatments were assigned by a completely randomized design. Data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in SPSS version 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). When ANOVA identified differences among groups, the difference in means was made with LSD multiple range tests. Statistical significance was determined at P ˂ 0.05. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Percentage data were arcsine transformed before analysis.

Results

Growth performance and feed utilization of the shrimp were significantly affected by dietary supplementation of the biofloc compared to those of shrimp fed the Con diet (Table 3). Final body weight, weight gain and specific growth rate of shrimp fed BF4 diet were significantly increased compared to those fed the Con diet. Dietary inclusion of the biofloc to the Con diet at level of 4.0% resulted in significantly higher protein efficiency ratio (PER) and lower feed conversion ratio (FCR) compared to the Con diet. Significantly higher feed intake (FI) was observed in shrimp fed the Con diet than in that fed the BF8 diet. The highest survival rate was obtained in BF0.5 group which was significantly different from other dietary groups.
Table 3

Growth performance and feed utilization of L. vannamei (initial BW: 1.01 ± 0.01 g) fed the seven experimental diets for 8 weeks

Treatment

FBW1

WG2

SGR3

FCR4

PER5

FI6

Survival7

Con

6.63 ± 0.55b

565 ± 49.6b

3.32 ± 0.13b

2.25 ± 0.21a

1.10 ± 0.11b

12.8 ± 0.13a

79.6 ± 16.0b

BF0.5

7.12 ± 0.44ab

610 ± 41.5ab

3.44 ± 0.10ab

2.09 ± 0.16ab

1.15 ± 0.09ab

12.8 ± 0.02ab

98.1 ± 3.21a

BF1

7.12 ± 0.82ab

608 ± 70.2ab

3.43 ± 0.17ab

2.10 ± 0.25ab

1.18 ± 0.15ab

12.8 ± 0.01ab

85.2 ± 8.49b

BF2

7.34 ± 0.71ab

635 ± 67.5ab

3.50 ± 0.16ab

2.01 ± 0.22ab

1.24 ± 0.13ab

12.7 ± 0.01ab

88.9 ± 0.00b

BF4

7.90 ± 0.13a

677 ± 8.40a

3.60 ± 0.02a

1.84 ± 0.04b

1.32 ± 0.03a

12.7 ± 0.04ab

85.2 ± 3.21b

BF6

7.27 ± 0.81ab

627 ± 81.4ab

3.47 ± 0.19ab

2.05 ± 0.27ab

1.20 ± 0.16ab

12.7 ± 0.04ab

88.9 ± 5.56b

BF8

7.56 ± 0.38ab

639 ± 39.8ab

3.51 ± 0.10ab

1.91 ± 0.15ab

1.28 ± 0.10ab

12.5 ± 0.48b

90.7 ± 6.42b

Values are mean of triplicate groups and presented as mean ± SD. Values in the same column having different letters are significantly different (LSD; P < 0.05)

1FBW (g) = Final body weight

2Weight gain (%) = [(final body weight - initial body weight)/initial body weight] x 100

3Specific growth rate (%) = 100 x [ln(final body weight) – ln(initial body weight)]/days

4Feed conversion ratio = dry feed fed/wet weight gain

5Protein efficiency ratio = fish weight gain (g)/protein

6Feed intake (g/fish) = dry feed consumed (g)/fish

7Survival (%)

Shrimp fed BF0.5 and BF4 diets showed significantly higher NBT activity than shrimp fed the Con diet (Table 4). Significantly higher PO activity was found in shrimp fed BF6 diet than those fed the Con diet. Significant increment in GPx activity was observed in BF6 groups in comparison to the Con group. Even though numerically higher values of other examined non-specific immune parameters were observed in shrimp fed the biofloc supplemented diets, the differences were not significant (P ˃ 0.05).
Table 4

Non-specific immune responses of L. vannamei fed the seven experimental diets for 8 weeks

Treatment

THC1

NBT2

PO3

SOD4

Ig5

GPx6

Con

0.33 ± 0.01

0.27 ± 0.04b

0.16 ± 0.01b

238 ± 18.6

31.2 ± 12.7

107 ± 37.7b

BF0.5

1.95 ± 1.30

0.32 ± 0.00a

0.18 ± 0.02b

240 ± 3.56

44.9 ± 13.6

133 ± 32.4ab

BF1

4.14 ± 0.52

0.28 ± 0.03ab

0.17 ± 0.02b

235 ± 30.8

30.6 ± 4.12

181 ± 25.4ab

BF2

2.26 ± 0.71

0.28 ± 0.02ab

0.18 ± 0.02b

254 ± 15.0

38.1 ± 6.97

157 ± 45.3ab

BF4

4.52 ± 3.81

0.32 ± 0.04a

0.16 ± 0.03b

249 ± 12.0

39.6 ± 6.29

184 ± 76.5ab

BF6

3.12 ± 1.46

0.29 ± 0.02ab

0.24 ± 0.04a

250 ± 37.5

43.6 ± 18.3

205 ± 55.3a

BF8

4.40 ± 4.29

0.31 ± 0.03ab

0.18 ± 0.04b

246 ± 9.13

37.4 ± 2.69

159 ± 40.9ab

Values are mean of triplicate groups and presented as mean ± SD. Values in the same column having different letters are significantly different (LSD; P < 0.05)

1Total haemocyte count (103 cells/mL)

2Nitro blue tetrazolium activity

3Phenoloxidase activity

4Superoxide dismutase (% inhibition)

5Total immunoglobulin (mg mL−1)

6Glutathione peroxidase activity (mU mL−1)

During the challenge test, the first dramatic mortality was observed on the 13th day after injection and shrimp fed the Con diet showed the lowest disease resistance compared to all other groups (Fig. 1). At the end of the challenge test, significantly higher survival rate was found in BF4 group compared to the Con groups; however, no significant difference was found among other biofloc supplemented groups.
Fig 1

Survival rate of L. vannamei after a challenge against V. harveyi

Discussion

Beneficial role of BFT system in penaeid shrimp has well been documented (Hari et al., 2006; Xu and Pan 2012). Recently, it was reported that use of biofloc as a dietary supplement had enhanced growth rate of L. vannamei (Ju et al., 2008; Kuhn et al., 2009, 2010). In the present study, dietary supplementation of biofloc at 4% level significantly (P < 0.05) enhanced growth, PER and FCR in the shrimp. It has been documented that bioflocs are the rich source of many bioactive compounds, such as carotenoids, chlorophylls, phytosterols, bromophenols, amino sugars (Ju et al., 2008) and anti-bacterial compounds (Crab et al., 2010). Thus, the enhanced growth performance of shrimp fed the biofloc containing diet in the current study might be explained by a bioactive or probiotic microbial components, such as Bacillus or Lactobacillus spp. present in the biofloc. On the other hand, biofloc supplementation at 8% level (BF8) did not result in proportionate enhancement in growth rate or FCR compared to those of the Con diet. Kuhn et al. (2010) supplemented a biofloc in L. vannamei diet and recorded significantly higher growth rate at 10 and 15%, but no significant difference at 20 and 30% dietary biofloc inclusion. The present results also agree with those of Wang (2007) and Anand et al. (2013) who reported that increment of dietary probiotic or periphytic algae in shrimp does not proportionally increase growth performance of shrimp. Moreover, reduction in growth of fishes was recorded at high level of microbial supplementation (Kiessling and Askbrandt 1993; Ajiboye et al., 2012) as microbial products at higher levels tend to reduce feed palatability and digestibility (Kiessling and Askbrandt 1993). However, the growth performance of BF6 and BF8 in the present study were comparable or relatively higher compared to the Con diet, indicating non negative growth effects in shrimp by the dietary biofloc supplementation up to 8%.

Shrimp lack specific or adaptive immune system that relies entirely on their innate immune mechanisms including both cellular and humoral responses for defense against pathogens (Vazquez et al., 2009). NBT activity was increased in the shrimp fed BF0.5 and BF4, while significantly higher PO activity was observed in BF6 group compared to those fed the Con diet. It was suggested that shrimp may release some useful substances into gastrointestinal tract that could potentially stimulate innate immune response (especially phagocytosis) and may release more hemocytes into their circulation when they ingested biofloc (Zhao et al., 2012). Some beneficial bacteria such as Bacillus sp. in the ingested biofloc could have facilitate modification of physiological and immunological status of the host through a colonization in the gastrointestinal tract and have triggered to change the endogenous microbiota (Johnson et al., 2008; Li et al., 2009). Ju et al. (2008) noted that both microbial components (Bacillus sp.) and bioactive compounds (e.g., polysaccharides and carotenoids) in biofloc could exert an immune-stimulating effect and this action would be continuous as long as the shrimp consumes biofloc. However, the modes of action of biofloc on innate immune mechanism of shrimp are very complicated and still unknown up to date. Further study is required for more detailed information and knowledge on this. Research on antioxidants has been attracted in aquaculture because fish or shrimp are susceptible to oxidative stress by disease or environmental changes (Liu and Chen, 2004; Castex et al., 2010). Shrimp possess an integrated antioxidant system including enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants to maintain normal oxidant status, especially to cope with natural or induced stressors (Castex et al., 2009; Parrilla-Taylor and Zenteno-Savín, 2011). Generally, the antioxidant capability of an organism under certain condition can reflect its health status. In the present study, increased GPx activity was observed in shrimp fed BF6 diet compared to those fed the Con diet. This result indicates that the antioxidant system of the shrimp can be enhanced by unknown components present in biofloc in some way. Based on its composition characteristics, the biofloc may play a role in antioxidant activity because of its carotenoids and fat-soluble vitamins (Ju et al., 2008) and improve the efficiency of feed utilization by stimulating activities of digestive enzymes because of high protease and amylase activity in biofloc (Xu and Pan 2012; Xu et al. 2012). Similarly, Xu and Pan (2013) reported an increase in total antioxidant capacity and SOD activity of L. vannamei reared in a biofloc-based tanks system.

During the challenge test against V. harveyi, significantly higher survival rate was found in BF4 group compared to the Con group. Similar observations were found by Ekasari et al. (2014) where following a challenge test by injection with infectious myonecrosis virus (IMNV) the survival of the challenged shrimp from the experimental biofloc groups was significantly higher when compared to the challenged shrimp from the control treatment.

Conclusions

This study indicates that dietary supplementation of a good source of biofloc at 4% level had beneficial effects on growth performance and health status in L. vannamei. The concurrent increases of non-specific responses of the shrimp fed the biofloc supplemented diets may suggest that the antioxidant defense system and innate immune system could work synergistically to improve the physiological performance of the shrimp leading to higher disease resistance against bacterial challenge. These results also indicate that the biofloc could be practically used as a viable alternative dietary supplement. It seems clear that the potential use of biofloc as a dietary supplement would be dependent upon the process method of the biofloc and the quantity of organic compounds and beneficial microorganism.

Abbreviations

BFT: 

Biofloc technology

FCR: 

Feed conversion ratio

FI: 

Feed intake

GPx: 

Glutathione peroxidase

Ig: 

Total immunoglobulin

NBT: 

Nitro blue tetrazolium

PER: 

Protein efficiency ratio

PO: 

Phenoloxidase

SOD: 

Superoxide dismutase

THC: 

Total hemocyte counts

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Korea Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, which provided federal funds to support the “Development of functional feed additives for shrimp using useful organic matter in biofloc-based rearing water.”

Funding

This study was funded by the Korea Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, which provided federal funds to support the “Development of functional feed additives for shrimp using useful organic matter in biofloc-based rearing water.”

Availability of data and materials

All datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Experimental protocols followed the guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee of Jeju National University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Marine Life Sciences, Jeju National University
(2)
Neo Environmental Business Co.

References

  1. Ajiboye OO, Yakubu AF, Adams TE. A perspective on the ingestion and nutritional effects of feed additives in farmed fish species. World J Fish & Marine Sci. 2012;4:87–101.Google Scholar
  2. Anand PSS, Kumar S, Panigrahi A, Ghoshal TK, Dayal JS, Biswas G, et al. Effects of C:N ratio and substrate integration on periphyton biomass, microbial dynamics and growth of Penaeus monodon juveniles. Aquaculture Int. 2013;21:511–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). Official Methods of Analysis. 16th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 1995.Google Scholar
  4. Avnimelech Y. Carbon/nitrogen ratio as a control element in aquaculture systems. Aquaculture. 1999;176:227–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Avnimelech Y. Biofloc technology—a practical guide book. 2nd ed. Baton Rouge: The World Aquaculture Society; 2012.Google Scholar
  6. Bauer W, Prentice-Hernández C, Tesser MB, Wasielesky W, Poersch LHS. Substitution of fishmeal with microbial floc meal and soy protein concentrate in diets for the pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture. 2012;342-343:112–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Burford MA, Thompson PJ, McIntosh RP, Bauman RH, Pearson DC. The contribution of flocculated material to shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) nutrition in a high-intensity, zero-exchange system. Aquaculture. 2004;232:525–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Castex M, Lemaire P, Wabete N, Chim L. Effect of dietary probiotic Pediococcus acidilactici on antioxidant defences and oxidative stress status of shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris. Aquaculture. 2009;294:306–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Castex M, Lemaire P, Wabete N, Chim L. Effect of probiotic Pediococcus acidilactici on antioxidant defences and oxidative stress of Litopenaeus stylirostris under Vibrio nigripulchritudo challenge. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2010;28:622–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Crab R, Lambert A, Defoirdt T, Bossier P, Verstraete W. The application of bioflocs technology to protect brine shrimp (Artemia franciscana) from pathogenic Vibrio harveyi. J Appl Microbiol. 2010;109:1643–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Crab R, Defoirdt T, Bossier P, Verstraete W. Biofloc technology in aquaculture: beneficial effects and future challenges. Aquaculture. 2012;356-357:351–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Dantzler AS, Burnett KG, Burnett LE. Effects of hypercapnic hypoxia and respiratory burst inhibition on the bactericidal activity of hemocytes from the penaeid shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Am Zool. 2001;41:1422–3.Google Scholar
  13. De Schryver P, Crab R, Defoirdt T, Boon N, Verstraete W. The basics of bioflocs technoloty: the added value for aquaculture. Aquaculture. 2008;277:125–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Ekasari J, Azhar MH, Surawidjaja EH, Nuryati S, De Schryver P, Bossier P. Immune response and disease resistance of shrimp fed biofloc grown on different carbon sources. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2014;41:332–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hari RE, Livingstone DM, Siber R, Burkhardt-Holm PA, Guettinger H. Consequences of climatic change for water temperature and brown trout populations in Alpine rivers and streams. Glob Change Biol. 2006;12:10–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Haslun J, Correia E, Strychar K, Morris T, Samocha T. Characterization of bioflocs in a no water exchange super-intensive system for the production of food size pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Int J Aquacult. 2012; doi: https://doi.org/10.5376/ija.2012.02.0006
  17. Hernández-López J, Gollas-Galván T, Vargas-Albores F. Activation of the prophenoloxidase system of the brown shrimp (Penaeus californiensis Holmes). Comp biochem phys C. 1996;113:61–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Jang IK, Pang Z, Yu J, Kim SK, Seo HC, Cho YR. Selectively enhanced expression of prophenoloxidase activating enzyme 1 (PPAE1) at a bacteria clearance site in the white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. BMC Immunol. 2011;12:70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson CN, Barnes S, Ogle J, Grimes DJ, Chang YJ, Peacock AD, Kline L. Microbial community analysis of water, foregut, and hindgut during growth of pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, in closed-system aquaculture. J World Aquac Soc. 2008;39:251–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Ju ZY, Forster IP, Conquest L, Dominy W. Enhanced growth effects on shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) from inclusion of whole shrimp floc or floc fractions to a formulated diet. Aquacult Nutr. 2008;14:533–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kent M, Browd CL, Leffler JW. Consumption and digestion of suspended microbes by juvenile Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture. 2011;319:363–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kiessling A, Askbrandt S. Nutritive value of two bacterial strains of single-cell protein for rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture. 1993;109:119–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Kuhn DD, Boardman GD, Lawrence AL, Marsh L, Flick GJ. Microbial floc meal as a replacement ingredient for fish meal and soybean protein in shrimp feed. Aquaculture. 2009;296:51–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuhn DD, Lawrence AL, Boardman GD, Patnaik S, Marsh L, Flick GJ. Evaluation of two types of bioflocs derived from biological treatment of fish effluent as feed ingredients for Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture. 2010;303:28–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee BJ, Kim SS, Song JW, Oh DH, Cha JH, Jeong JB, Heo MS, Kim KW, Lee KJ. Effects of dietary supplementation of citrus by-products fermented with a probiotic microbe on growth performance, innate immunity and disease resistance against Edwardsiella tarda in juvenile olive flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus (Temminck & Schlegel). J Fish Dis. 2013;36:617–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Li P, Gatlin DM. Dietary brewers yeast and the prebiotic GrobioticTM AE influence growth performance, immune responses and resistance of hybrid striped bass (Morone chrysops × M. saxatilis) to Streptococcus iniae infection. Aquaculture. 2004;231:445–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Li J, Tan B, Mai K. Dietary probiotic Bacillus OJ and isomaltooligosaccharide influence the intestine microbial populations, immune responses and resistance to white spot syndrome virus in shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Aquaculture. 2009;291:35–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu CH, Chen JC. Effect of ammonia on the immune response of white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei and its susceptibility to Vibrio alginolyticus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2004;16:321–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Paglia DE, Valentine WN. Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase. Transl Res. 1967;70:158–69.Google Scholar
  30. Parrilla-Taylor DP, Zenteno-Savín T. Antioxidant enzyme activities in Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) in response to environmental hypoxia and reoxygenation. Aquaculture. 2011;318:379–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Robertson L, Bray W, Leung-Truillo J, Lawrence A. Practical molt staging of Penaeus setiferus and Penaeus stylirostris. J World Aquac Soc. 1987;18:180–5.Google Scholar
  32. Siwicki AK, Anderson DP, Rumsey GL. Dietary intake of immunostimulants by rainbow trout affects non-specific immunity and protection against furunculosis. Vet Immunol Immunop. 1994;41:125–39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Stokstad E. Down on the shrimp farm. Science. 2010;328:1504–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Vazquez L, Alpuche J, Maldonado G, Agundis C, Pereyra-Morales A, Zenteno E. Review: immunity mechanisms in crustaceans. Innate Immun. 2009;15:179–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang YB. Effect of probiotics on growth performance and digestive enzyme activity of the shrimp Penaeus vannamei. Aquaculture. 2007;269:259–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Wasielesky W, Atwood H, Stokes A, Browdy CL. Effect of natural production in a zero exchange suspended microbial floc based super-intensive culture system for white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture. 2006;258:396–403.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Wongsasak U, Chaijamrus S, Kumkhong S, Boonanuntanasarn S. Effects of dietary supplementation with β-glucan and synbiotics on immune gene expression and immune parameters under ammonia stress in Pacific white shrimp. Aquaculture. 2015;436:179–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Xu WJ, Pan LQ, Zhao DH, Huang J. Preliminary investigation into the contribution of bioflocs on protein nutrition of Litopenaeus vannamei fed with different dietary protein levels in zero-water exchange culture tanks. Aquaculture. 2012;350-353:147–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Xu WJ, Pan LQ. Effects of bioflocs on growth performance, digestive enzyme activity and body composition of juvenile Litopenaeus vannamei in zero-water exchange tanks manipulating C/N ratio in feed. Aquaculture. 2012;356-357:147–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Xu WJ, Pan LQ. Enhancement of immune response and antioxidant status of Litopenaeus vannamei juvenile in biofloc-based culture tanks manipulating high C/N ratio of feed input. Aquaculture. 2013;412-413:117–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhao P, Huang J, Wang XH, Song XL, Yang CH, Zhang XG, et al. The application of bioflocs technology in high-intensive, zero exchange farming systems of Marsupenaeus japonicus. Aquaculture. 2012;354-355:97–106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement