Skip to main content

Validation of housekeeping genes as candidate internal references for quantitative expression studies in healthy and nervous necrosis virus-infected seven-band grouper (Hyporthodus septemfasciatus)

Abstract

Background

In the present study, we evaluated four commonly used housekeeping genes, viz., actin-β, elongation factor-1α (EF1α), acidic ribosomal protein (ARP), and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as internal references for quantitative analysis of immune genes in nervous necrosis virus (NNV)-infected seven-band grouper, Hyporthodus septemfasciatus.

Methods

Expression profiles of the four genes were estimated in 12 tissues of healthy and infected seven-band grouper. Expression stability of the genes was calculated using the delta Ct method, BestKeeper, NormFinder, and geNorm algorithms. Consensus ranking was performed using RefFinder, and statistical analysis was done using GraphpadPrism 5.0.

Results

Tissue-specific variations were observed in the four tested housekeeping genes of healthy and NNV-infected seven-band grouper. Fold change calculation for interferon-1 and Mx expression using the four housekeeping genes as internal references presented varied profiles for each tissue. EF1α and actin-β was the most stable expressed gene in tissues of healthy and NNV-infected seven-band grouper, respectively. Consensus ranking using RefFinder suggested EF1α as the least variable and highly stable gene in the healthy and infected animals.

Conclusions

These results suggest that EF1α can be a fairly better internal reference in comparison to other tested genes in this study during the NNV infection process. This forms the pilot study on the validation of reference genes in Hyporthodus septemfasciatus, in the context of NNV infection.

Introduction

The analysis and quantification of mRNA expression in different animal experimental settings are crucial in understanding the cause or outcome of a biotic or abiotic factor under study. The reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) is a versatile and widely used technique to study the absolute or relative gene expression studies due to its accuracy, sensitivity, reproducibility, and wider dynamic range (Bustin et al. 2005; Huggett et al. 2005). The quality and accuracy of the data generated from a qPCR experiment relies on the normalization of the output with a constitutively expressed gene to avoid experimental errors caused by cDNA concentration, variations in RNA, reverse transcription efficiency, and PCR efficiency (Dheda et al. 2004). The ideal reference gene for qPCR should have a constant expression in different tissues/cells or developmental stages and should be unaffected by the experimental situations (Radonic et al. 2004). Housekeeping genes such as those encoding β-actin, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), and elongation factor 1 alpha (EF1α) are commonly used as internal references. Although housekeeping genes are generally involved in the maintenance of cellular homeostasis, they are assumed to be constitutively expressed; however, many studies demonstrated that the expression levels of these genes vary significantly with different factors (Ingerslev et al. 2006; McCurley and Callard 2008; Su et al. 2011; Paria et al. 2016). Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate suitable reference genes to choose the best performing candidate in all the experimental settings to prevent the misinterpretation of qPCR output and to get an accurate gene expression profile.

Grouper is an important warm and temperate water fish, distributed in the tropical, subtropical, and temperate zone waters (Meng et al. 1995) with great economic value for aquaculture. They belong to the family Epinephelinae, comprising of 159 marine species in 15 genera. The seven-band grouper, Hyporthodus septemfasciatus, is a high-valued marine finfish having an immense aquaculture potential in Southeast Asia. They inhabit the shallow water zones around 5–30 m in Korea, Japan, and China (Heemstra and Randall 1993). They are regarded as candidate species for aquaculture due to their limited resource and high economic value. The studies on the seven-band grouper have been increasing in recent years and has been focused mainly on the reproductive biology, early development, and disease pathology including the viral nervous necrosis (VNN) that causes heavy mortality in the larval and juvenile groupers during the summer season (Kim et al. 2012). The reports on gene expression profiling studies in seven-band grouper are limited; however, to understand the biology of the fishes and molecular mechanisms associated with infections, it is important to examine the functional genes involved in these aspects. The identification of a suitable reference gene in seven-band grouper is crucial for accurate immune gene expression profiling. The objective of the current study was to validate housekeeping genes of seven-band grouper to identify a candidate reference gene as an internal control for expression profiling studies during NNV infection.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

Juveniles of healthy seven-band grouper (7.8 g ± 0.5 g) were maintained in the wet lab facility at 20–22 °C and daily fed with a commercial diet. All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Chonnam National University (CNUIACUC-YS-2018-3).

Sample preparation

To study the expression of the housekeeping genes in normal seven-band grouper, tissues including brain, gill, eye, heart, spleen, liver, gut, head kidney, trunk kidney, blood, muscle, and skin were collected and stored immediately at − 80 °C. Tissues of three animals were pooled, and five such replicates were used to study the gene expression. For NNV challenge study, fish were injected intramuscularly with 100 μL of 103.5 TCID50 NNV in L-15. Fish injected with sterile L-15 were used as control. At 0, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h of viral challenge, fish were sacrificed and the aforementioned tissues were collected and pooled in the same manner as described above.

RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

Total RNA from the tissues were extracted using Tri reagent (MRC, USA) according to manufactures instruction. One microgram of the DNase treated total RNA was reverse-transcribed by ReverTraAce qPCR RT Kit (Toyobo, Japan) primed with random hexamers according to manufacturer’s instruction. The prepared first-strand cDNA was diluted in nuclease-free water to get 100 ng/μL and stored at − 20 °C until use.

Primer designing for reference genes and PCR efficiency

A total of four reference genes were selected for gene expression analysis viz., actin- β, elongation factor-1α (EF1α), acidic ribosomal protein (ARP), and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Specific primers for each of the genes were designed based on the nucleotide sequences from the H. septemfasciatus brain transcriptome data (Kim et al. 2017) using Primer-BLAST suite (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/) (Table 1). The optimal annealing temperature of each primer was about 60 °C and the amplicons were within the range of 100–150 bp. PCR specificity was confirmed with a single melt peak in dissociation curve analysis. PCR efficiency was calculated based on the slope of a standard curve generated using tenfold serial dilutions (10, 10−1, 10−2, 10−3, and 10−4) of liver cDNA.

Table 1 Sequence, efficiency and correlation coefficient of the primers used in the present study

Quantitative real-time PCR

All reactions were carried out on in an Exicycler 96 Real-Time Quantitative Thermal Block (Bioneer, Korea) using the AccuPower 2XGreenStar qPCR Master Mix (Bioneer, Korea) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The reactions were performed in triplicates with 10 μM of each primer and 100 ng of cDNA per reaction. The thermal profile consisted of 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s and 60 °C for 10 s. A dissociation curve analysis of the amplification was performed from 60 to 95 °C ateither 0.1 °C/s melting rate with a smooth curve setting averaging 1 point to confirm that only the specific PCR product was amplified and detected.

Fold change expression of immune genes

To further evaluate the expression stability of housekeeping genes, a comparative fold change expression analysis of immune genes, IFN-1 and Mx, at 48 h post-infection was undertaken. Fold change was separately calculated for both immune genes with actin- β, EF1α, ARP, and GAPDH as internal controls using the comparative CT method (2−∆∆CT method) (Livak and Schmittgen 2001).

Data analysis

Gene expression stability was evaluated using delta Ct method (Silver et al. 2006) and four commonly used programs viz., geNorm V3.5 (Vandesompele et al. 2002), NormFinder (Andersen et al. 2004), and BestKeeper V1 (Pfaffl et al. 2004). The comprehensive ranking of the expression stability was evaluated using the RefFinder program (Xie et al. 2012). Statistical analysis for the differences in the expression level of actin-β, EF1α, ARP, and GAPDH was done by linear regression and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using GraphPad Prism 5.0 (La Jolla, CA, USA). The difference was considered to be significant at p < 0.05.

Results

Quantitative real time PCR efficiency and intra- and inter-assay variability

The four housekeeping genes, viz., actin-β, EF1α, ARP, and GAPDH were amplified by qPCR from 12 different tissues of the healthy and NNV-infected animals. The amplified products ranged from 100 to 150 bp. The PCR efficiency was calculated using the equation: PCR efficiency (E%) = (10–1/slope − 1) × 100. All reactions displayed efficiency between 100% and 105% (Table 1). Intra-assay variation was < 1.19% and inter-assay variation was < 0.98% in this study, indicating high reproducibility of the assay.

Expression level and stability of housekeeping genes in healthy tissues

Expression levels were evaluated in 12 different tissues for all four housekeeping genes. The mean expression levels for all the studied genes were in the range of 14–18 Ct values (Fig. 1, Additional file 1). However, GAPDH showed significant variation in its expression across the normal tissues with Ct value of 14.7 in the eye and 25.6 in the liver. Compared with all the tissues, the gut showed expression for all the housekeeping genes. The highest variation in expression of the house keeping genes was in the muscle. Heart displayed significant variation in its expression for all the four genes: skin and spleen for actin-β and GAPDH, respectively; liver for EF1α and GAPDH, respectively; and head kidney and trunk kidney for EF1α and actin-β, respectively (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure1

Graphical representation of absolute Ct values for each gene analyzed in healthy and infected seven-band grouper. Whiskers represent the maximum and minimum values. Data represented as mean ± SEM, asterisk shows significant difference at p < 0.05

Fig. 2
figure2

Expression levels of candidate reference genes in different tissues of healthy and infected seven-band grouper. Data represented as mean ± SEM of ten replications. a-d indicates the expression levels of ARP, actin-β , EF1α and GAPDH respectively

For expression stability analysis, the stability ranking for the four genes obtained from the delta Ct method, Bestkeeper, geNorm, and NormFinder programs were compared. ARP was found to be the most stable expressed gene by the delta Ct, norm finder, and the geNorm, whereas, EF1α by the bestkeeper and geNorm (Fig. 3). The overall ranking for stability of candidate reference genes determined by RefFinder was in the order: ARP > EF1α > actin-β > GAPDH.

Fig. 3
figure3

Determination of the expression stability in healthy (ad) and NNV-infected (eh) seven-band grouper tissues evaluated using different programs (viz., Delta Ct, Bestkeeper, NorrnFinder, and geNorm)

Expression level and stability of housekeeping genes in NNV-infected tissues

Variation in the expression profile of selected housekeeping genes was analyzed in all the 12 tissues of fish challenged with the NNV. As shown in Fig. 1, the Ct values of the four genes ranged between 14.89 and 16.88. The most highly expressed gene was EF1α in the gut followed by ARP, actin-β, and EF1α in the heart. The most variable expression was recorded for GAPDH with the expression level of 14.08 in the eye and 22.52 in the liver. Significant variation in the expression of all the four genes was observed in the spleen while the expression of GAPDH, actin-β, and ARP was variable in the liver. EF1α and GAPDH showed significant expression in the gut, actin-β showed significant expression in the eye, and EF1α showed significant expression in the gill, which was followed by significant expression of ARP in the blood, skin, and muscle.

Actin-β was found to be the most stable expressed gene in the NNV-infected tissues as predicted by all the four methods (Fig. 3). The decreasing order of stability was further EF1α followed by GAPDH and ARP. Comprehensive stability ranking according to the refFinder suggested that actin-β is the most suitable gene with a geomean value of 1.0, and the overall stability order was actin-β > EF1α > GAPDH > ARP.

Time-dependent expression of housekeeping genes post-NNV challenge

Following the NNV challenge, the variation in the expression of housekeeping genes was evident. As represented in Fig. 4a, the expression of EF1α was found to be more consistent compared with other genes. Statistical analysis showed a significant difference in the expression among all genes and also with time for ARP, actin-β, and GAPDH. Expression of EF1was not statistically different across the time points showing a stable expression. Further analysis by linear regression (Fig. 4b) also represented a stable expression of EF1α followed by actin-β, whereas there was a significant difference in the expression of ARP and GAPDH.

Fig. 4
figure4

Time-dependent expression profile of housekeeping genes following NNV infection in the tissues of seven-band grouper. a Mean Ct value of housekeeping gene transcription in grouper tissues following NNV infection (n = 5). b Linear regression curve of housekeeping gene expression (p < 0.05, n = 5)

Fold change expression of immune genes

To evaluate the performance of housekeeping genes in the fold change evaluation of immune genes, expression of IFN-1 and Mx in the brain, eye, spleen, kidney, and blood was analyzed (Fig. 5). Significant variation in the fold change expression and calculation thereof was observed in the tissues using different housekeeping genes. Fold change varied from 0.5–1.5 fold for IFN-1 in the blood and spleen between the four housekeeping genes. In the case of Mx expression, pronounced variation in the fold change was evident in the blood and kidney.

Fig. 5
figure5

Fold change expression values of IFN-1 and Mx in different organs of seven-band grouper analyzed with different housekeeping genes. Data represented as mean ± SEM of five replications. a, b represents the fold change expression comparison of IFN-1 and Mx gene respectively

Identification of a candidate reference gene for infection studies in H. septemfasciatus

Consensus ranking of each gene was calculated from the geometric mean of the refFinder (Fig. 3) stability values of healthy tissues and infected tissues. Thus, EF1α (1.624) was found to be the most suitable internal reference control for infection-related gene expression studies in H. septemfasciatus followed by actin-β (1.646), ARP (2.181), and GAPDH (3.464).

Discussion

In the present study, we analyzed the stability of four seven-band grouper housekeeping genes as internal standards for quantitative immune gene expression studies in relation to NNV-infection. The expression of housekeeping genes varies with various factors such as development, stress, and infection, and a thorough validation of housekeeping genes for different factorial conditions is desirable (Bustin 2000). Studies on reference gene validation have been undertaken in various fish species for different experimental conditions (Olsvik et al. 2005; Fernandes et al. 2008; Tang et al. 2007; Zheng and Sun 2011; Purohit et al., 2016; Paria et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2017). In our study, EF1α was found to be the most stable gene in all the healthy tissues, whereas GAPDH was ranked as the least stable gene by all the four methods. The concurrent finding has also been observed for the gene expression profile of Epinephelus akaara, wherein GAPDH and actin-β were the least stable genes (Wang et al. 2017). Paria et al. (2016) reported that EF1α and actin-β as the most stably expressed transcripts in the normal tissues of Asian seabass. EF1α was found to be the most consistently expressing gene in Atlantic salmon tissues (Olsvik et al. 2005; Ingerslev et al. 2006; Jorgensen et al. 2006) and showed least tissue specific expressions in Atlantic halibut (Øvergård et al. 2010). These observations were contradictory in case of zebrafish and Japanese founder, where actin-β was the most stable expressed gene (Casadei et al. 2011; Zheng and Sun 2011). These differences in the expression patterns of housekeeping genes can be as a result of physiological differences pertaining to the different fish species.

Actin-β, GAPDH, and B2M are commonly used internal controls for grouper gene expression studies using the RT-qPCR method (Tang et al. 2008; Huang et al. 2009; Luo et al. 2010; Liu et al. 2012). However, the evidence based on the previous studies cannot be generalized because the expression stability of these genes in grouper species per se is still unclear. From our observations, actin-β was the most stable expressed gene in NNV-infected tissues. In half-smooth tongue sole, actin-β was found to be the stable expressing gene in all the 12 tested tissues following LPS or Vibrio anguillarum challenge (Li et al. 2010). In NNV-infected Atlantic halibut, RPL7 and EF1α were found to be the candidate reference genes (Øvergård et al. 2010), whereas, in European seabass, ribosomal protein L13a was identified as the stably expressing gene following NNV challenge (Mitter et al. 2009). GAPDH was not a suitable choice for the infection-related gene expression studies in seven-band grouper owing to its high degree of variability in the infected tissues. This shortcoming of GAPDH as an internal control has been reported in other fish species, including infectious salmon anemia virus infection in Atlantic salmon and Edwardsiella tarda infection in Japanese flounder (Jorgensen et al. 2006; Zheng and Sun 2011). The instability in the expression of GAPDH might be due to its diverse range of functions in glycolysis, DNA replication and repair, protein phosphotransferase/kinase reactions, membrane transport and fusion, translational regulation and phosphotransferase activity, and nuclear RNA export, resulting in its transcript abundance sensitive to cell homeostasis which could alter during a viral or bacterial infection.

Using the four methods, stability in the expression of housekeeping genes was highly variable in healthy and NNV-infected tissues. Based on the integration of the stability results in healthy and NNV-infected tissues, only EF1α satisfied the stability threshold for the infection-related gene expression studies out of the four reference genes studied. The results were in concordance with the findings of Paria et al. (2016) highlighting EF1α as a candidate internal reference in normalizing RT-qPCR data in infection-related gene expression studies.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the expression and stability of the four housekeeping genes tested in this study have tissue-dependent variation in healthy as well as NNV-infected fish seven-band grouper tissues with significant variation in the fold change calculations for immune genes. Considering the consensus ranking of overall stability, EF1α was found to be the most suitable reference gene in infection studies of grouper. The outcome of this study may potentiate future research works on gene expression studies in response to NNV infection in H. septemfasciatus.

Availability of data and materials

All datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ARP:

Acidic ribosomal protein

Ct:

Threshold cycle

EF1α:

Elongation factor-1α

GAPDH:

Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase

IFN-1:

Interferon-1

Mx:

Interferon-induced GTP-binding protein

NNV:

Nervous necrosis virus

References

  1. Andersen CL, Jensen JL, Ørntoft TF. Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res. 2004;64(15):5245–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bustin SA. Absolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. J Mol Endocrinol. 2000;25(2):169–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bustin SA, Benes V, Nolan T, Pfaffl MW. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR–a perspective. J Mol Endocrinol. 2005;34(3):597–601.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Casadei R, Pelleri MC, Vitale L, Facchin F, Lenzi L, Canaider S, Strippoli P, Frabetti F. Identification of housekeeping genes suitable for gene expression analysis in the zebrafish. Gene Expression Patterns. 2011;11(3-4):271–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dheda K, Huggett JF, Bustin SA, Johnson MA, Rook G, Zumla A. Validation of housekeeping genes for normalizing RNA expression in real-time PCR. Biotechniques. 2004;37(1):112–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fernandes JM, Mommens M, Hagen Ø, Babiak I, Solberg C. Selection of suitable reference genes for real-time PCR studies of Atlantic halibut development. Comp Biochem Physiol. Part B: Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2008;150(1):23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heemstra, P.C., JE Randall. 1993. FAO species catalogue. Vol. 16. Groupers of the world. (Family Serranidae, Subfamily Epinephelinae). An annotated and illustrated catalogue of the grouper, rockcod, hind, coral grouper and lyretail species known to date. FAO Fish. Synops, 125.

  8. Huang W, Zhou L, Li Z, Gui JF. Expression pattern, cellular localization and promoter activity analysis of ovarian aromatase (Cyp19a1a) in protogynous hermaphrodite red-spotted grouper. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009;307(1-2):224–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huggett J, Dheda K, Bustin S, Zumla A. Real-time RT-PCR normalisation; strategies and considerations. Genes Immun. 2005;6(4):279.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ingerslev HC, Pettersen EF, Jakobsen RA, Petersen CB, Wergeland HI. Expression profiling and validation of reference gene candidates in immune relevant tissues and cells from Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Mol. Immunol. 2006;43(8):1194–201.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jorgensen SM, Kleveland EJ, Grimholt U, Gjoen T. Validation of reference genes for real-time polymerase chain reaction studies in Atlantic salmon. Mar.Biotechnol. 2006;8(4):398–408.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim CS, Kim WS, Nishizawa T, Oh MJ. Prevalence of viral nervous necrosis (VNN) in sevenband grouper Epinephelus septemfasciatus farms. J. Fish Pathol. 2012;25(2):111–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim JO, Kim JO, Kim WS, Oh MJ. Characterization of the transcriptome and gene expression of brain tissue in sevenband grouper (Hyporthodusseptemfasciatus) in response to NNV infection. Genes. 2017;8(1):31.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Li Z, Yang L, Wang J, Shi W, Pawar RA, Liu Y, Xu C, Cong W, Hu Q, Lu T, Xia F. β-Actin is a useful internal control for tissue-specific gene expression studies using quantitative real-time PCR in the half-smooth tongue sole Cynoglossus semilaevis challenged with LPS or Vibrio anguillarum. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2010;29(1):89–93.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu Q, Lu H, Zhang L, Xie J, Shen W, Zhang W. Homologues of sox8 and sox10 in the orange-spotted grouper Epinepheluscoioides: sequences, expression patterns, and their effects on cyp19a1a promoter activities in vitro. Comp Biochem Physiol. Part B: Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2012;163(1):86–95.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT method. Methods. 2001;25:402–408.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Luo YS, Hu W, Liu XC, Lin HR, Zhu ZY. Molecular cloning and mRNA expression pattern of Sox9 during sex reversal in orange-spotted grouper (Epinepheluscoioides). Aquaculture. 2010;306(1-4):322–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McCurley AT, Callard GV. Characterization of housekeeping genes in zebrafish: male-female differences and effects of tissue type, developmental stage and chemical treatment. BMC Mol Biol. 2008;9(1):102.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Meng QW, Su JX, Miao XZ. Systematics of fish China Agriculture Press. Beijing, China. 1995:606–22.

  20. Mitter K, Kotoulas G, Magoulas A, Mulero V, Sepulcre P, Figueras A, Novoa B, Sarropoulou E. Evaluation of candidate reference genes for QPCR during ontogenesis and of immune-relevant tissues of European seabass (Dicentrarchuslabrax). Comp Biochem Physiol. Part B: Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2009;153(4):340–7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Olsvik PA, Lie KK, Jordal AEO, Nilsen TO, Hordvik I. Evaluation of potential reference genes in real-time RT-PCR studies of Atlantic salmon. BMC Mol Biol. 2005;6(1):21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Øvergård AC, Nerland AH, Patel S. Evaluation of potential reference genes for real time RT-PCR studies in Atlantic halibut (HippoglossusHippoglossus L.); during development, in tissues of healthy and NNV-injected fish, and in anterior kidney leucocytes. BMC Mol Biol. 2010;11(1):36.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Paria A, Dong J, Babu PP, Makesh M, Chaudhari A, Thirunavukkarasu AR, Purushothaman CS, Rajendran KV. Evaluation of candidate reference genes for quantitative expression studies in Asian seabass (Latescalcarifer) during ontogenesis and in tissues of healthy and infected fishes. Indian J Exp Biol. 2016;54:597–605.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pfaffl MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians TP. Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper–Excel-based tool using pair-wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett. 2004;26(6):509–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Purohit GK, Mahanty A, Mohanty BP, Mohanty S. Evaluation of housekeeping genes as references for quantitative real-time PCR analysis of gene expression in the murrel Channa striatus under high-temperature stress. Fish PhysiolBiochem. 2016;42(1):125–35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Radonić A, Thulke S, Mackay IM, Landt O, Siegert W, Nitsche A. Guideline to reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR. BiochemBiophys Res Commun. 2004;313(4):856–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Silver N, Best S, Jiang J, Thein SL. Selection of housekeeping genes for gene expression studies in human reticulocytes using real-time PCR. BMC Mol Biol. 2006;7(1):33.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Su J, Zhang R, Dong J, Yang C. Evaluation of internal control genes for qRT-PCR normalization in tissues and cell culture for antiviral studies of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodonidella). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2011;30(3):830–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tang R, Dodd A, Lai D, McNabb WC, Love DR. Validation of zebrafish (Danio rerio) reference genes for quantitative real-time RT-PCR normalization. Acta BiochimBiophys Sin. 2007;39(5):384–90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tang X, Liu X, Zhang Y, Zhu P, Lin H. Molecular cloning, tissue distribution and expression profiles of thyroid hormone receptors during embryogenesis in orange-spotted grouper (Epinepheluscoioides). General CompEndocrinol. 2008;159(2-3):117–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, De Paepe A, Speleman F. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 2002;3(7):0034–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang H, Zhang X, Liu Q, Liu X, Ding S. Selection and evaluation of new reference genes for RT-qPCR analysis in Epinephelus akaara based on transcriptome data. PloS one. 2017;12(2):e0171646.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Xie F, Xiao P, Chen D, Xu L, Zhang B. miRDeepFinder: a miRNA analysis tool for deep sequencing of plant small RNAs. Plant Mol. Biol. 2012;80(1):75–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Zheng WJ, Sun L. Evaluation of housekeeping genes as references for quantitative real time RT-PCR analysis of gene expression in Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2011;30(2):638–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the National Research Foundation (NRF), Ministry of Education Science and Technology (MEST), and Chonnam National University, Republic of Korea, for the support.

Funding

The research was supported by a grant (2018R1D1A1B07041277) from the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education Science and Technology (MEST), Republic of Korea.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RK and OMJ designed this study and wrote the manuscript. RK, SSNQ, JOK, and JOK performed the experiments and analyzed the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Myung-Joo Oh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Chonnam National University (CNUIACUC-YS-2018-3).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1:

Table S1. Mean overall Ct value of all the organs analyzed from five replications (pool of 3 animal in each replication) in control and infected group.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krishnan, R., Qadiri, S.S.N., Kim, J. et al. Validation of housekeeping genes as candidate internal references for quantitative expression studies in healthy and nervous necrosis virus-infected seven-band grouper (Hyporthodus septemfasciatus). Fish Aquatic Sci 22, 28 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41240-019-0142-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Housekeeping gene
  • Expression stability
  • RT-qPCR
  • Nervous necrosis virus