Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

The relationship between fishing characteristics of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) and ocean conditions around Jeju Island

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1Email author,
  • 1 and
  • 2
Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences201821:1

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41240-017-0078-4

  • Received: 20 September 2017
  • Accepted: 13 December 2017
  • Published:

Abstract

Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) is one of the commercially important species in Korea as well as other countries of the North Pacific. Korean offshore large purse seine fisheries targeting small pelagic fishes such as chub mackerel have caught T. orientalis temporarily in the east of Jeju Island. The catch of T. orientalis in March through June occupied approximately 60% of the total. The monthly catch around Jeju Island from 2004 to 2013 showed a negative correlation (r = − 0.755, p < 0.01) with the seawater temperature at 50 m and had a significant positive correlation (r = 0.856, p < 0.01) with the Pacific Decadal Oscillation Index (PDOI). The highest catch and catch per unit effort (CPUE) of T. orientalis around Jeju Island occurred either when the seawater temperature ranged between 15 and 16 °C at 50 m or when the catch was taken near the frontal area where two water masses from offshore and coastal areas collide. The length of T. orientalis caught around Jeju Island from 2004 to 2013 ranged from 19 to 193 cm in fork length (FL). The time series of the monthly mean FL of T. orientalis had a negative correlation (r = − 0.592, p < 0.01) with the seawater temperature at 50 m and had a significant positive correlation (r = 0.668, p < 0.05) with PDOI.

Keywords

  • Thunnus orientalis
  • Fishing ground
  • Environmental factors
  • Seawater temperature
  • Pacific Decadal Oscillation Index (PDOI)

Background

There are three species of bluefin tuna in the world: Pacific bluefin tuna, Thunnus orientalis; Atlantic bluefin tuna, Thunnus thynnus; and southern bluefin tuna, Thunnus maccoyii. Pacific bluefin tuna, T. orientalis, is the largest fish in Scombridae, and the maximum length and weight recorded in the Pacific Ocean are about 300 cm and 555 kg, respectively. According to the experiment by Shimose et al. (2009), the high growth rate of T. orientalis during the first 5 years allows them to attain the body length around 150 cm, and the rate gradually decreases thereafter. However, the growth, in general, stops at the age of ten, and the longevity exceeds 20 years. The size of a male T. orientalis is larger than that of a female in the older age groups, and this is caused by the differential growth rates between the sexes. Harada (1980) stated that spawning of T. orientalis occurs at the age of about 5 years when it reaches around 150 cm in FL and 60 kg in weight. Two main spawning grounds of T. orientalis had been identified to be in the southwestern North Pacific, one off east Taiwan and one in the south of the East Sea (Okiyama 1974; Chen et al. 2006; Tanaka et al. 2007), but currently, there is no evidence for any local stocks in both spawning regions (Shimose et al. 2009). T. orientalis is a highly migratory species occurring throughout the North Pacific Ocean ranging from the East Asian coast to the western coast of North America and is also recorded as a visitor to the South Pacific (Collette 1999; IUCN 2014). The fish maintains higher body temperatures than ambient temperatures; therefore, this ability would enable them to be distributed widely in the ocean (Carey and Teal 1969; Graham and Dickson 2004). T. orientalis often repeats vertical movements below the thermocline in the daytime, although the fish spends most of the time swimming within the surface mixed layer (Kitagawa et al. 2007).

Also, this species feeds on round herring, pompano, mackerel, saury, skipjack tuna, and sardine (Kida 1936; Doi 1960; Yokota et al. 1961). T. orientalis competes with albacore, yellowtail, barracuda, and mackerel over food (Bell 1963). Yokota et al. (1961) mentioned the presence of juvenile T. orientalis in the stomachs of skipjack. Yamanaka (1963) stated that the immature has many predators such as seal, dolphin, spear-fish, swordfish, and shark.

The catch of T. orientalis in the Pacific Ocean as well as the world is much less than that of skipjack, yellowfin, and albacore tuna (FAO 2010). Nevertheless, the commercial value of this species exceeds that of other tunas (The Pew Charitable Trusts 2016). The catch of T. orientalis of the Korean fisheries fluctuated annually, which had been at a very low level until the end of the 1990s but increased thereafter. In the case of the North Pacific, it showed the similar trend with the total catch of Korean waters.

Recently, the climate has been changed rapidly, and ocean ecosystems also respond to this change (Hollowed et al. 2011). Many scientists have carried out research about the relationship between climate change and fishery because climate change such as global warming and ocean acidification became a serious issue in the ocean ecosystems. The variation in temperature, wind field, and precipitation has an influence on the ocean’s water properties, which sequentially impacts on ocean ecosystem including fish stocks (Drinkwater 2005). Lehodey et al. (2003) stated that the recruitment of tuna species in the Pacific was correlated with the climate indices such as Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) and Pacific Decadal Oscillation Index (PDOI).

Few studies on the fishery and ecological characteristics of T. orientalis in Korean waters have been conducted, although T. orientalis was recognized as a commercially important species. For the sustainable yield of T. orientalis with the proper stock assessment and management, the ecological research on the distribution of fishing ground and basic biological characteristics should be conducted. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the fishing grounds of T. orientalis around Jeju Island of Korea to identify the relationship between the fishing characteristics of T. orientalis and environmental factors.

Methods

In this study, T. orientalis fishery-related parameters were collected from the Korean large purse seine fisheries around Jeju Island. The catch and effort (the number of sets) data used in the study area were obtained from Busan Cooperative Fish Market (BCFM) and fisheries cooperatives radio station during 2004–2013. Catch per unit effort (CPUE) of T. orientalis was calculated based on the catch divided by the number of sets. Fork length (FL) of T. orientalis was measured from about 38,000 by the field survey in BCFM during 2004–2013(Table 1). The annual catch data from 2010 to 2013 in Korean waters came from Korean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS, http://kosis.kr/statisticsList/statisticsList_01List.jsp?vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&parentId=F#SubCont), and the data before 2009 was revised value by calculating the actual weight of T. orientalis per box. And those in the North Pacific were obtained from the International Scientific Committee for Tuna and Tuna-like Species in the North Pacific Ocean (ISC, http://isc.fra.go.jp/working_groups/pacific_bluefin_tuna.html) during 1982–2012 to figure out the trends of the annual catch.
Table 1

The number of individuals, size ranges, and mean length with standard deviation (mean ± SD) of the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) collected from 2004 to 2013

Month

January

February

March

April

May

June

July

August

September

October

November

December

Total

Size ranges (mean ± SD)

Year

2004

 

87

12

72

126

217

72

    

11

597

40.6~115.7 cm (58.15 ± 15.05 cm)

2005

73

97

47

40

 

42

294

  

113

 

73

779

40.0~78.5 cm (51.18 ± 6.35 cm)

2006

1054

520

833

586

149

225

320

419

   

117

4223

31.0~82.4 cm (55.9 ± 11.11 cm)

2007

1383

1222

371

1

15

281

306

144

96

123

 

417

4359

23.1~146.9 cm (52.63 ± 10.04 cm)

2008

2409

1406

1425

713

800

728

1474

172

24

127

81

855

10,214

32.0~187.0 cm (58.08 ± 25.67 cm)

2009

1191

1028

2432

800

 

393

80

894

416

89

63

37

7468

30.0~171.0 cm (57.76 ± 20.35 cm)

2010

130

82

1413

344

 

302

46

107

 

188

 

51

2663

38.0~178.0 cm (73.84 ± 27.54 cm)

2011

113

210

598

375

95

288

119

112

89

36

466

91

2592

30.0~182.0 cm (46.89 ± 7.01 cm)

2012

824

1043

150

 

855

330

598

23

 

5

1

57

3886

34.0~168.0 cm (54.32 ± 15.01 cm)

2013

419

21

362

289

29

389

10

33

 

27

21

14

1614

19.0~193.0 cm (57.81± 18.75 cm)

Total

7596

5716

7643

3220

2069

3195

3319

1904

670

708

632

1723

38,395

 

Size ranges (mean ± SD)

19.0~82.1 cm (49.31 ± 8.25 cm)

31.0~158.0 cm (50.00 ± 29.58 cm)

31.7~171.0 cm (64.79 ± 29.58 cm)

35.0~193.0 cm (66.66 ± 30.43 cm)

34.0~168.0 cm (59.19 ± 22.80 cm)

39.0~169.0 cm (59.20 ± 16.18 cm)

23.1~115.7 cm (53.56 ± 8.31 cm)

30.0~187.0 cm (58.20 ± 8.33 cm)

30.0~68.0 cm (43.07 ± 8.26 cm)

36.0~72.1 cm (48.68 ± 9.04 cm)

40.0~125.0 cm (50.62 ± 8.33 cm)

38.0~81.0 cm (62.44 ± 12.78 cm)

  
The habitat conditions such as seawater temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen were examined by bi-monthly information collected through oceanographic surveys (Fig. 1). This oceanographic data from 2004 to 2013 were obtained from the Korea Oceanographic Data Center (KODC). We assumed that seawater properties at the surface and 50 m off Jeju Island represent the habitat characteristics of T. orientalis because T. orientalis spend most of the time in the mixed layer with the exception of frequent dives (Kitagawa et al. 2000). Annual sea surface temperature (SST) collected by Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) satellite during 2004–2013 was investigated to identify the seawater temperature at the fishing ground. In addition to seawater properties, several monthly climate indices such as Pacific Decadal Oscillation Index (PDOI) and the Arctic Oscillation Index (AOI) were selected to correlate with month average of catch and FL of T. orientalis using SPSS software. PDOI is the leading empirical orthogonal function (EOF) of monthly sea surface temperature anomalies over the North Pacific (poleward of 20° N) after the global average sea surface temperature has been removed (Deser et al. 2010). And AOI is a low-frequency mode of atmospheric variability of the southern hemisphere. It is defined as a belt of westerly winds or low pressure surrounding Antarctica which moves north or south as its mode of variability (Australian Bureau of Meteorology 2013). Those climatic indices were collected from http://jisao.washington.edu/pdo/PDO.latest and http://jisao.washington.edu/ao/#data, respectively.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Map showing the study area with oceanographic survey stations around Jeju Island

The joint confident region on the fishing spot of T. orientalis (long., lat.) was analyzed to determine the distribution area of T. orientalis in the study area (Yang et al. 2012). Joint confident region indicates the ellipse which has the major axis (λ1) and the minor axis (λ2). The formula for calculating the ellipse is as in the following:

$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}{\lambda}_1=0.5\cdot \left[{S_1}^2+{S_2}^2+\sqrt{{\left({s_1}^2+{s_2}^2\right)}^2-4\left({s_1}^2{s_2}^2-{s_{12}}^2\right)}\right]\\ {}{\lambda}_2={s_1}^2+{s_2}^2-{\lambda}_1\end{array}} $$
(1)
where s1 and s2 are the standard deviation of X and Y, and s12 is the covariance. Formula 2 is to analyze the slopes of the major axis (b1) and the minor axis (b2) which indicate the direction of the ellipse.
$$ {b}_1=\frac{s_{12}}{\lambda_1-{s_1}^2},{b}_2=\frac{-1}{b_1} $$
(2)

Results

Mean seawater temperature at 50 m was low in the first half of the year but increased in the second half of the year (Fig. 2a). The catch and the FL of T. orientalis in the first half of the year (i.e., winter and spring) were higher than those in the second half (i.e., summer and fall) (Figs. 3b and 4b). The time series of annual seawater temperature indicated that year 2007 was relatively the warm period, whereas year 2011 was relatively the cool period (Fig. 2a). The catch of T. orientalis in 2007 was double than those in 2011 (Fig. 3a). Also, the PDOI was generally high from winter through spring and comparatively low from summer through fall (Fig. 2b). In the case of annual PDOI, when the PDOI had a low value such as in 2008, the catch of T. orientalis was high. From 2004 to 2005, however, when the PDOI had a relatively high value, the catch was low (Fig. 3a).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Variability of a seawater temperature at 50 m and b index for PDO, 2004–2013. Note that seawater temperature at 50 m and PDOI were collected in bi-monthly and monthly basis, respectively

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Changes in a annual catch of T. orientalis caught in Korean waters and in the study area, 2004–2013, and b monthly mean catch with standard deviation in the study area, 2004–2013

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Length frequency distributions of T. orientalis caught in Korean waters, 2004–2013. a Proportion at each size range. b Monthly mean fork length with standard deviation

The annual catch of T. orientalis in the North Pacific Ocean had continuously fluctuated during 1982–2012 (Fig. 5a). It demonstrated the low catch (about 10,000 t) in the late 1980s through the early 1990s, and a relatively high level of catch (about 20,000 t) maintained from the mid-1990s to the mid-2000s. The annual catch of T. orientalis reached the highest (33,000 t) in 2000 and showed a general tendency of decrease thereafter. In Korean waters, the annual catch of T. orientalis started 31 t in 1982, and it showed less than 1000 t until the end of the 1990s (Fig. 5b). The catch recorded 2400 t in 2000, and it hit the record (2600 t) in 2003. The catch has generally decreased since 2003 with a minor fluctuating pattern. The annual catch trends of T. orientalis from the Korean waters, and the study area seemed to be parallel during 2004–2013 (Fig. 3a). It had increased continuously from 350 t in 2004 to 1414 t in 2008 and then tended to decrease reaching 500 t in 2013. Monthly variation of T. orientalis indicated that high catches were recorded in spring to early summer while very low catches in fall (Fig. 3b). The catch in March through June occupied about 60% of the total, and the mean catch in March was the highest (135 t) and continuously decreased to fall. Catches in September to November were only about 2% of the total catch.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Annual catch of T. orientalis a in the North Pacific (ISC, http://isc.ac.affrc.go.jp/working_groups/pacific_bluefin_tuna.html), 1982–2012, and b in Korean waters (KOSIS, http://kosis.kr/statisticsList/statisticsList_01List.jsp?vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&parentId=F#SubCont), 1982–2012

T. orientalis caught from the study area during the 2004–2013 period showed the FL range of 19–293 cm with the mean of about 60 cm (Fig. 4a). Length frequency graph revealed that the length mode of 40–60 cm accounted for 70% of the total. The second and third largest ones in proportion were the length groups of 60–80 cm (13%) and 20–40 cm (8%), respectively. Monthly mean length of T. orientalis indicated that the larger sizes were found in spring (i.e., 66.7 cm in April) (Fig. 4b). In general, smaller sizes appeared in fall (i.e., 43 cm in September).

The range and direction of the joint confident region (i.e., ellipse) were analyzed in every year based on catch information, and the locations of ellipse were overlapped to the SST distribution in the study area (Fig. 6). Most ellipses located on the east side of Jeju Island and the major axis of ellipses seemed to parallel (i.e., east-west direction) to the flow direction of Tsushima Current. Distribution of fishing ground matched with the specific annual temperature ranges observed by MODIS satellite. For example, in 2004, the main fishing ground of T. orientalis was distributed over the SST range of 19–20 °C, and temperature information in other years also showed the similar ranges. In general, the locations of main fishing areas seemed to be in SST ranges of 19–23 °C off Jeju Island during 2004–2013.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Comparison between the joint confident regions in the fishing grounds of T. orientalis and the annual mean SST, 2004–2013

The environmental, fisheries, and biological data were statistically examined using correlation analysis (Table 2). Since the PDOI, catch, and FL showed higher values in the first half than the second half of the year (Figs. 2b, 3b, and 4b), while seawater temperature at 50 m revealed the opposite pattern (Fig. 2a); the PDOI has significant positive correlations with monthly mean catch (r = 0.856, p < 0.01). Seawater temperature at 50 m showed negative correlations with monthly mean catch (r = − 0.755, p < 0.01) and monthly mean FL (r = − 0.592, p < 0.01 for). The lower the temperature at 50 m in depth was, the higher the catch and the bigger the length of T. orientalis became. On the other hand, there were no significant correlations between catch and length with environmental factors such as salinity, dissolved oxygen, and AOI.
Table 2

Correlation coefficients between catch and length of Pacific bluefin tuna, Thunnus orientalis, with environmental factors off the Jeju Island during 2004–2013

Environmental factors

Monthly mean catch

Monthly mean length

PDOI

0.856**

AOI

0.312

Seawater temperature at 0 m

− 0.359

− 0.408

Seawater temperature at 50 m

− 0.755**

− 0.592**

Salinity at 0 m

0.048

0.194

Salinity at 50 m

0.409

0.443

Dissolved oxygen at 0 m

0.570

0.314

Dissolved oxygen at 50 m

0.500

0.325

The numbers used for the climate indices (i.e., PDOI and AOI) and the seawater properties (temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen) were 12 (monthly) and 6 (bi-monthly), respectively

**Indicates the significant level of 0.01

Spatial distribution of CPUE of T. orientalis overlapped with the mean temperature at 50 m during the period of 2004 to 2013 (Fig. 7). In February, the mean temperature at 50 m of the study area was about 15.5 °C, and CPUE was lower than the other season and had high value (1–2 t/set) near 16 °C isotherm. In April, the mean temperature at 50 m was similar to February, but CPUE was found to be over 10 t/set in the 15 °C isotherm. In June, the mean temperature at 50 m was about 16 °C, and CPUE was high (1–7 t/set) in the temperature of 15–16 °C. Seawater temperatures were increased until August, and the CPUE also maintained in high levels (1–11 t/set). However, in October, the mean seawater temperature at 50 m marked the highest (about 21 °C), and CPUE sharply dropped below 1 t/set. In December, seawater temperature was decreased to about 19 °C, and CPUE was again increased to 18.8 t/set.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7

Spatial distribution of CPUE of T. orientalis off the southern coast of Korean Peninsula over the mean temperature distribution at 50 m during 2004 to 2013

Discussion

The annual total catch of T. orientalis had fluctuated in Korean waters from 2004 to 2013. The catch of T. orientalis in the study area had occupied about 50–80% of the total catch. Also, this study area is regarded as the main fishing ground of T. orientalis in Korean waters. Therefore, we assumed that the fishery and ecological characteristics of T. orientalis caught in the study area could represent those of T. orientalis lived in Korean waters. We analyzed how variations in environmental factors and climate indices in the study area have effects on the catch and the length of T. orientalis. The monthly mean catch and length of T. orientalis in this study showed a strong seasonal difference, and most of T. orientalis caught around Jeju Island ranged 40–60 cm that was classified as an immature (Yukinawa 1967). On the other hand, the fishing ground of T. orientalis was located off the eastern Jeju Island, and the annual mean SST ranged 19–23 °C. According to Fig. 8, T. orientalis has two spawning grounds that are located in the northern area of Kuroshio axis in the Taiwan Sea and the East Sea (Bayliff 1994; Okiyama 1974; Chen et al. 2006; Tanaka et al. 2007). Therefore, the fishing ground around Jeju Island is regarded as the path for migrating northward of immature T. orientalis which was spawned in the Taiwan Sea.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8

Distribution and spawning areas of Pacific bluefin tuna, Thunnus orientalis (ISC, http://isc.fra.go.jp/working_groups/pacific_bluefin_tuna.html)

The analysis between the temperature at 50 m and the monthly mean catch of T. orientalis showed that the lower the seawater temperature was, the higher the catch was available. The temperatures in April and June indicated the high catch in 15–16 °C ranges, which were a relatively cool condition, whereas the temperatures in October and December were high (about 20 °C), but catches were low. Schick et al. (2004) inferred that the change of the seawater temperature affecting tuna species was very important. Bayliff (1994) insisted that a temperature range for optimum activity of T. orientalis was 14–18 °C. These results from previous studies are similar to our results representing high catch in the temperature range of 15–16 °C. In the case of CPUE, the mean temperature of areas with high CPUE was also at about 15–16 °C. And in addition, a temperature front (i.e., by colliding two water masses, where the temperature rapidly changed rather than others) could be regarded as another factor affecting the high CPUE in August. Generally, marine populations, not only prey but also predator, were abundant in frontal areas due to the concentrated nutrients. In the previous study, the catch of skipjack and albacore recorded high catches in the frontal area which was related to the temperature gradient and chlorophyll concentration (Laurs et al. 1984; Fiedler and Bernard 1987). Also, Podesta et al. (1993) mentioned that the catch of swordfish was high in SST frontal area. Likewise, the research for other factors such as prey affecting the high CPUE and the catch is necessary. We, however, had difficulty in comparing the relationship between CPUE as well as the catch and the temperature in the whole area or this study area, because the area in which the temperature was observed did not cover the entire area of catch.

According to the result of correlation coefficient analysis between the monthly average of PDOI and the catch, when PDOI had the highest value, the value of the catch was also high. This result meant that SST was low if PDOI indicated a high value. Therefore, the high PDOI resulted in the increasing of T. orientalis catch. In the previous study, the catch of chum salmon caught in the North Pacific Ocean was significantly correlated with the climate indices including PDOI (Kim et al. 2007). In the analysis between the monthly mean length and seawater temperature at 50 m, the higher the temperature was, the smaller the length of T. orientalis became. This result is inferred that small one pretends the warm condition, comparatively. According to Brill and Lutcavage (2001), juvenile of Atlantic bluefin tuna appear to have a clear preference for warm condition in the range of 22–25 °C. In this study, when the temperature was the highest about 21 °C in October, the length of T. orientalis was the smallest. On the other hand, SST was not significantly correlated with the catch and the length. However, according to this analysis, the SST pattern of the entire scale throughout North Pacific Ocean (PDOI) has a significant correlation with the catch. More research is needed to answer this question.

Conclusions

In the relationship between the monthly catch and environmental factors, the catch of T. orientalis was affected by seasonal variation. When the seawater temperature at 50 m was low (i.e., winter and spring), the catch was high. In the case of the PDOI, when the PDOI was high (i.e., winter and spring), the catch was high. In the time series of annual variation, when the SST was comparatively warm (i.e., warm period), the catch of T. orientalis was high. In addition, when the PDOI had low values, the catch was high. The fishing ground had been formed in the east of Jeju Island in the period of this study. The highest catch and catch per unit effort (CPUE) of T. orientalis around Jeju Island occurred either when the seawater temperature at 50 m ranged between 15 and 16 °C or when the catch was taken near the frontal area.

Abbreviations

AOI: 

Artic Oscillation Index

BCFM: 

Busan Cooperative Fish Market

CPUE: 

Catch per unit effort

FL: 

Fork length

ISC: 

International Scientific Committee for Tuna and Tuna-like Species in the North Pacific Ocean

KODC: 

Korea Oceanographic Data Center

KOSIS: 

Korean Statistical Information Service

PDOI: 

Pacific Decadal Oscillation Index

SOI: 

Southern Oscillation Index

SST: 

Sea surface temperature

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the people who helped publish this paper. This study was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Fisheries Science (R2017027).

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Fisheries Science (R2017027).

Availability of data and materials

All except for datasets from other countries within this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

All authors designed the direction of this study. They read and approved the manuscript.

Ethics approval

The experiment with the animals was conducted by the guidelines of National Institute of Fisheries Science.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Institute of Fisheries Science, Busan, 46083, Republic of Korea
(2)
Pukyong National University, Busan, 48513, Republic of Korea

References

  1. Australian Bureau of Meteorology. 2013. The southern annular mode. Retrived from http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/enso/history/ln-2010-12/SAM-what.shtml. Accessed 15 Sept.
  2. Bayliff WH. A review of the biology and fisheries for northen bluefin tuna, Thynnus thynnus, in the Pacific Ocean. FAO Fish Tech Pap. 1994;336:244–95.Google Scholar
  3. Bell RR. Synopsis of biological date on California bluefin tuna Thynnus saliens Jordan and Evermann 1926. FAO Fish Rep. 1963;6(2):308–421.Google Scholar
  4. Brill RW, Lutcavage ME. Understanding environmental influences on movements and depth distributions of tunas and billfishes can significantly improve population assessments. In: American Fisheries Society Symposium. American Fisheries Society. 2001. p. 179–198.Google Scholar
  5. Carey FG, Teal JM. Regulation of body temperature by the bluefin tuna. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1969;28(1):205–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen KS, Crone P, Hsu CC. Reproductive biology of female Pacific bluefin tuna Thynnus orientalis from south-western North Pacific Ocean. Fish Sci. 2006;72(5):985–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Collette BB. Mackerels, molecules, and morphology. In: Proceedings of the 5th Indo-Pacific Fish Conference. Seret B and Sire JY, eds. Societe Francaise d’Ichtyologie, Paris, 1999;149–164.Google Scholar
  8. Deser C, Alexander MA, Xie SP, Phillips AS. Sea surface temperature variability: patterns and mechanisms. Annu Rev Mar Sci. 2010;2:115–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Doi T. On the predatory relationships among bluefin tuna and coastal fishes in the southern waters of Japan. Bull Japan Soc Sci Fish. 1960;26(2):99–102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Drinkwater KF. The response of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) to future climate change. ICES J Mar Sci. 2005;62(7):1327–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. FAO. Global Tuna Catches by Stock. 2010 Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/tuna-catches/en
  12. Fiedler PC, Bernard HJ. Tuna aggregation and feeding near fronts observed in satellite imagery. Cont Shelf Res. 1987;7(8):871–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Graham JB, Dickson K. Tuna comparative physiology. J Exp Biol. 2004;207(23):4015–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Harada T. Development and future outlook of studies on the aquaculture of tunas In: Maguro Gyogyo Kyogikai Gijiroku, Suisancho-Enyo Suisan Kenkyusho (Proceedings of the Tuna Fishery Research Conference). Japan Fisheries Agency-Far Seas Fisheries Research Laboratory, Simizu, 1980 6–7.Google Scholar
  15. Hollowed AB, Barange M, Ito S-I, Kim S, Loeng H, Peck MA. Effects of climate change on fish and fisheries: forecasting impacts, assessing ecosystem responses, and evaluating management strategies. ICES J Mar Sci. 2011;68(6):984–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. IUCN. Red list of threatened species. Thunnus orientalis. 2014 Retrieved from http://www.iucnredlist.org/details/summary/170341/0
  17. Kida T. On the surface temperature of water in the tunny fishing grounds off Kusiro and Urakawa in summer. Bull Jap Soc Sci Fish. 1936;5(2):87–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim S, Kang S, Seo H, Kim E, Kang M. Climate variability and chum salmon production in the North Pacific. The Sea. 2007;12(2):61–72.Google Scholar
  19. Kitagawa T, Boustany AM, Farwell CJ, Williams TD, Castleton MR, Block BA. Horizontal and vertical movements of juvenile bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) in relation to seasons and oceanographic conditions in the eastern Pacific Ocean. Fish Oceanogr. 2007;16(5):409–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Kitagawa T, Nakata H, Kimura S, Itoh T, Tsuji S and Nitta A. Effect of ambient temperature on the vertical distribution and movement of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis). Mar Ecol Prog Series. 2000;206,251–260.Google Scholar
  21. Laurs RM, Fiedler PC, Montgomery DR. Albacore tuna catch distribution relative to environmental features observed from satellites. Deep Sea Res. 1984;31(9):1085–99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Lehodey P, Chai F, Hampton J. Modelling climate-related variability of tuna populations from a coupled ocean–biogeochemical-populations dynamics model. Fish Oceanogr. 2003;12(4–5):483–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Okiyama M. Occurrence of the postlarvae of bluefin tuna, Thynnus thynnus, in the Japan Sea. Bull Japan Sea Reg Fish Res Lab. 1974;25:89–97.Google Scholar
  24. Podesta GP, Browder JA, Hoey JJ. Exploring the association between swordfish catch rates and thermal fronts on U.S. longline grounds in the western North Atlantic. Cont Shelf Res. 1993;13(2–3):253–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Schick RS, Goldstein J, and Lutcavage ME. Bluefin tuna (Thunnus Thynnus) distribution in relation to sea surface temperature fronts in the Gulf of Maine (1994–96). Fish Oceanogr. 2004;13(4),225–238.Google Scholar
  26. Shimose T, Tanabe T, Chen KS, Hsu CC. Age determination and growth of Pacific bluefin tuna, Thunnus orientalis, off Japan and Taiwan. Fisf Res. 2009;100(2):134–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Tanaka Y, Mohri M, Yamada H. Distribution, growth and hatch date of juvenile Pacific bluefin tuna Thynnus orientalis in the coastal area of the sea of Japan. Fish Sci. 2007;73(3):534–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. The Pew Charitable Trusts. Netting billions: a global valuation of tuna. 2016 Retrieved from http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/reports/2016/05/netting-billions-a-global-valuation-of-tuna. Accessed 15 Sept.
  29. Yamanaka H. Synopsis of biological data on kuromaguro Thynnus orientalis (Temminck and Schlegal) 1942 (Pacific Ocean). FAO Fish Rep. 1963;6(2),180–217.Google Scholar
  30. Yang JH, Lee SI, Yoon SC, Kim JB, Chun YY, Kim SW, Lee JB. Migration and distribution changes of the sandfish, Arcroscopus japonicus in the East Sea. J Korean Soc Fish Tech. 2012;48(4):401–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Yokota T, Toriyama M, Kanai F, Nomura S. Studies on the feeding habit of fishes. Rep Nankai Reg Fish Res Lab. 1961;14:1–234.Google Scholar
  32. Yukinawa M. Age and growth of bluefin tuna, Thynnus thynnus (Linnaeus), in The North Pacific Ocean. Rep Nankai Reg fish res lab 25, 1967 1–18.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2018

Advertisement